*HTML is ON *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WDirkIs this Neil Armstrong inscribed WSS litho genuine? I thought Neil Armstrong never signed on the American flag.Rick MulheirnIf nothing else, because it fails the "flag test" I would say not.fredtravThere are several things wrong with this. The flag jumping out as the worst, but the T's are also wrong etc.SpaceAholicLooks ok to me. Do we know for a fact Armstrong NEVER/unintentially inscribed over the flag when hastily signing? Robert PearlmanThe "flag test" was not absolute, nor was it meant to be; there are more than a few authentic examples of Armstrong's writing crossing over the flag. The test identified a specific forger's style that consistently crossed the flag.As Fred noted, the shape of the "T" in the inscription is off, as are the other letters, and then look at the overall size and placement of the writing.Ken HavekottePlain and simple, it's not Armstrong's own handwriting, in addition to a few other major issues associated with the signature and placement of it.DirkThe seller also has another Armstrong for sale...Mike DixonThe inscription is WAY off. I don't trust the rest of it either.capoetcThis one is disturbing because of all the peripheral items included in the sale.Given the other items the seller has for sale, there is a good chance that the seller does not know the Armstrong signature on the litho is a really bad fake. Whomever created it specifically created it to go with a legitimate Apollo Achievement Award, so the fake signature is fake inscribed to the recipient of the award. Some unsuspecting buyer may think the signature is good in large part because of the other items included in the sale with it.Maybe the item is for sale by the seller on consignment from someone who wanted a "legitimate" seller to market it?Steve ZarelliMy hot take of the day:I don't think the signature is bad.Clearly the dedication is highly atypical. It may have been added by another hand, but I'd reserve final judgement for that with an in-hand review or much better photo. This is with the disclaimer that this is a relatively small photo that is not crisp and taken at an angle. Assessments can change when presented with better photos. SpaceSteveI just looked at a blown-up image of the photo, and it looks to my untrained eye, that the "Best Wishes" was written OVER Neil's signature. It just appears that the W in "Wishes" crosses over the top of the A in "Armstrong". I compared the points where the W and A cross, against the points where the lines cross in Neil's actual signature and paraph.If I am seeing it correctly, that could support Steve Z's thought that the signature itself might be good, but that the inscription was added later by the recipient, or someone else.chetThis has to be one of the stranger Armstrong signed items I've ever come across, but I agree with Steve. I think the signature (alone) is authentic (if not it would be hands down the best fake I've ever seen). The piece is, of course, thrown off by the inscription, which is clearly not in Armstrong's hand. There could be any number of things to account for that but, in my opinion, it makes the whole piece a somewhat "iffy" investment. By the way, the seller's other Armstrong offering appears to be authentic in every way, for what it's worth.IanhethoFine points made by all. But it is almost like the pen matches perfectly, That's a neat trick in itself. Did the Shulers borrow Neil's red pen to scribble all over his autograph??Steve ZarelliPerhaps it was signed at an event using the recipient’s pen, which the recipient took back after Neil signed. Later, to "make it more personal" they added their own name. This theory makes the most sense to me. However, what it puzzling is how the dedication does bear some resemblance to Armstrong's writing. Typically when you see recipient added dedications, they look nothing like the signer's writing. chetAgree, Steve, since Armstrong signing in red is atypical in itself. Perhaps the "adders-on" also saw examples of Armstrong's inscriptions at a later time and tried to emulate his handwriting.capoetcAre there really other examples of authentic autographs with forged inscriptions?I've never seen one before, not even a secretarial inscription. The only thing I have seen that is even close would be, for example, a Mercury 7 signed photo with "To Billy from the Mercury astronauts" in a secretarial hand.Mike DixonThere was one a few years back from Buzz Aldrin and an inscription but an authentic signature. It was posted for sale on here extensively.smh99I recall seeing something similar a year or two ago, an apparently genuine Armstrong signature with an inscription in a different hand.While an uninscribed signature may be worth more to collectors, for "street cred" I would rather have one personalised to me. I can understand how someone may have done that themselves.The red pen used on this one is unusual.Steve Zarelli quote:Originally posted by Mike Dixon:There was one a few years back from Buzz Aldrin and an inscription but an authentic signature. There are MANY authentic Aldrins with secretary dedications. When he used to sign through the mail, he would often sign a stack in advance and his wife would handle the mail and add the personalization.IanhethoWell it had 9 bidders, 19 bids in all and sold for $622.
As Fred noted, the shape of the "T" in the inscription is off, as are the other letters, and then look at the overall size and placement of the writing.
Given the other items the seller has for sale, there is a good chance that the seller does not know the Armstrong signature on the litho is a really bad fake. Whomever created it specifically created it to go with a legitimate Apollo Achievement Award, so the fake signature is fake inscribed to the recipient of the award. Some unsuspecting buyer may think the signature is good in large part because of the other items included in the sale with it.
Maybe the item is for sale by the seller on consignment from someone who wanted a "legitimate" seller to market it?
I don't think the signature is bad.
Clearly the dedication is highly atypical. It may have been added by another hand, but I'd reserve final judgement for that with an in-hand review or much better photo.
This is with the disclaimer that this is a relatively small photo that is not crisp and taken at an angle. Assessments can change when presented with better photos.
If I am seeing it correctly, that could support Steve Z's thought that the signature itself might be good, but that the inscription was added later by the recipient, or someone else.
By the way, the seller's other Armstrong offering appears to be authentic in every way, for what it's worth.
However, what it puzzling is how the dedication does bear some resemblance to Armstrong's writing. Typically when you see recipient added dedications, they look nothing like the signer's writing.
I've never seen one before, not even a secretarial inscription. The only thing I have seen that is even close would be, for example, a Mercury 7 signed photo with "To Billy from the Mercury astronauts" in a secretarial hand.
While an uninscribed signature may be worth more to collectors, for "street cred" I would rather have one personalised to me. I can understand how someone may have done that themselves.
The red pen used on this one is unusual.
quote:Originally posted by Mike Dixon:There was one a few years back from Buzz Aldrin and an inscription but an authentic signature.
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.